Blog Layout

Were Women at the Last Supper?

Margaret Hebblethwaite • 9 May 2024

The Tablet used WAC Ireland's "Last Supper" painted by Irish artist Nora Kelly on its cover


Always at the table


The many images of Jesus eating with the Twelve Apostles on the night before he died might dominate our imagination. But the gospels suggest that a wider circle of followers shared his last Passover meal – and it is unthinkable that women were excluded / By MARGARET HEBBLETHWAITE; The Tablet 23 March 2024


WERE WOMEN AT the Last Supper? There is a general assumption that they were not. After all, in the paintings there are just 12 men plus Jesus (with the exception of Fra Angelico’s fresco which has Jesus’ mother in the scene, and some recent attempts at a more inclusive portrayal). The assumption of women’s absence from the Supper, visually reinforced, has become so deeply embedded in our Christian psyche that most people accept it without question. Sometimes it has even been made the basis for doctrinal conclusions, along the lines that Jesus was making a point about male (priestly) and female (non-priestly) roles by only inviting men to his Last Supper.


But artists are rarely theologians, and they take their cue from what other artists have done, even when it is inaccurate. Take for example the tradition of painting only one woman at the Feast of Pentecost, although Acts 1:14 clearly says there was a group of women with Jesus’ mother in the Upper Room. Twelve men around the mother of Jesus has become the symbol of Pentecost, just as 12 men plus Jesus seated around a table has become the iconographic indication of the Last Supper. But to be frank, it is quite enough for artists to have to fit 13 people into their paintings; so this number should be taken as representative of a larger group, rather than as an accurate teaching tool.


Increasingly scholars have been questioning the supposition that there were no women at the Last Supper. Let me say from the start that I am discounting the argument put forward by those who say women must have been there because “who else would have done the cooking?” It is welcome to find that Jesus dispatches two of his most senior male disciples, Peter and John, to prepare the meal (Luke 22:8). He did not share the patriarchal prejudices of his time.


THE SCRIPTURAL basis for thinking only men were present at the Last Supper – in so far as there is one – is that the synoptic gospels (but not John) stress the presence of the Twelve at the meal, and the Twelve were indeed all men: “He took his place with the Twelve” (Matthew 26:20); “He came with the Twelve” (Mark 14:17); “He took his place at the table and the Apostles with him” (Luke 22.14). But this is a comment on who was there, not on who was not there. For the climax of his ministry – the institution of the Eucharist, his arrest, death and Resurrection – Jesus called for the presence of his key colleagues (although the men ran away when he was arrested).


But it is also said, and more repeatedly, that Jesus was at the Last Supper with his “disciples” (Matthew 26:17, 18, 19, 26; Mark 14:12, 14, 16; Luke 22:11, 39; John 13:5). The creeping clericalism that elides the Apostles with the disciples is to be avoided. The disciples (μαθητα, mathētai, from the verb μανθάνω, manthanō, “to learn”) are a wider group and the Twelve were chosen from among them: “He called his disciples and chose twelve of them, whom he also named Apostles” (Luke 6:13). Apostles (πόστολοι, apostoloi, from the verb ποστέλλω, apostellō, “to send out”) are people sent out on mission. Obviously, you have to be a student before you can be sent out as a teacher.


Jesus did not send out women into situations where they might have been mocked, insulted or sexually accosted, but there is plenty of evidence that women were in the group of disciples. As Jesus went preaching through Galilee he was accompanied by the Twelve and by women, who included Maria of Magdala, Joanna, Susanna, and “many others” (Luke 8:1-3). Matthew and Mark also recognise that many women had “followed Jesus from Galilee and had provided for him” (Matthew 27:55; Mark 15:40). The women who went to the empty tomb were told: “Remember how he told you, while he was still in Galilee, that the Son of Man must be handed over to sinners, and be crucified, and on the third day rise again” (Luke 24:6-7); Jesus had said this “with only the disciples near him” (Luke 9:18- 22), so the women must have been disciples.


What more evidence is there that others were present at the Last Supper along with the Twelve? It would make little sense for Jesus to say, when questioned on who would betray him, “It is one of the Twelve” (Mark 14:20), if only the Twelve were present; he would have said, “It is one of you.” In the fourth gospel, “the disciple Jesus loved” leant on his breast at the Supper to ask the name of the betrayer (John 13:25). It is probably now a minority of Scripture scholars who still hold to the old tradition that the Beloved Disciple was John son of Zebedee, one of the Twelve. Two prominent Catholic biblical experts, Raymond Brown and Rudolf Schnackenburg (described by Joseph Ratzinger as “probably the most significant German-speaking Catholic exegete of the second half of the twentieth century”), changed their minds on this, while it is the conservative evangelical scholars who tend to stick with the traditional view. 


Compared with the other gospels, which are based on the memories of the Galilean Twelve, the traditions coming from the

Beloved Disciple that shape the fourth gospel are not only very different in style and content, but are more Jerusalem-based. In fact, the main point made by those who still argue that the Beloved Disciple was John son of Zebedee is that he had to be one of the Twelve since he was at the Last Supper: this would leave us with a circular argument.


Not only was the Beloved Disciple present at the Last Supper, but Cleopas must have been too, and his unnamed walking companion to Emmaus, who is unlikely to be one of the Twelve since Cleopas does the talking. It is a reasonable guess that Cleopas is walking with his wife, as “Maria [the wife] of Clopas” had been present at the Cross (John 19:25), and Cleopas is the Greek equivalent of the Semitic name Clopas. They recognised Jesus in the way he took bread, blessed it, broke it, and gave it to them (Luke 24:30, 35). Only eyewitnesses of the first Eucharist three days earlier could have made this connection.

The Twelve-minus-one returned to the Upper Room after the Ascension, together with the women, and in the presence of the larger Christian family they decided to elect a replacement for Judas so as to become Twelve again. It had to be “one of the men who have accompanied us during all the time that the Lord Jesus went in and out among us, beginning from the baptism of John until the day when he was taken up from us”. There were two candidates considered eligible and suitable, Justus and Matthias, and Matthias was chosen by lot. So these two must also have been present at the Last Supper, since that was such an essential part of the apostolic witness.


Those present at the Last Supper, therefore, would have included the Beloved Disciple, Cleopas, probably his wife, Justus and Matthias, and undoubtedly more besides. The core Twelve were always accompanied by women and other disciples in the Upper Room. The women “returned” there from the empty tomb, to give their report “to the eleven and to all the rest” (Luke 24:9). Cleopas and his companion went there to tell their story to “the eleven and their companions” (Luke 24:33). And we know the disciples living and praying there together after the Ascension included women (Acts 1:14).


Why is more explicit mention not made of the presence of women at the Last Supper? It was not thought necessary to do so, because the presence of women was assumed whether or not they were mentioned. There is a give- away line in Matthew’s gospel at the end of the Miraculous Feeding. “Those who ate were about five thousand men, not including the women and children” (Matthew 14:21). Never again should we refer to that miracle as the Feeding of the Five Thousand.


SO MUCH for textual evidence, but we also need to employ our knowledge of the Passover meal, the critical last days of Jesus’ life and his attitude towards women. Given that the Passover meal was so much a family religious ritual, it would be unthinkable to eliminate the women from it. (In a bizarre turnaround, Eduard Schweizer, back in 1970, took this as an argument against the Last Supper being a Passover meal!) Are we to think that the “many women” who followed Jesus from Galilee to the Cross (Matthew 27:55) were told to go away for the Passover meal, only to be admitted to the Upper Room after it was over? Jesus says, “With such longing I have desired to eat this Passover with you before I suffer” (Luke 22:15). How would he bid goodbye to those women he loved so dearly – among them Maria of Magdala, Maria of Bethany, and his own mother – if he were to exclude them from the great farewell event that was also the doorway into a new form of relationship?


In “The Testimony of Mary Magdalene” the poet Sally Read sees a eucharistic meaning in the Noli me tangere spoken by the risen Jesus to Maria of Magdala. Although poetry is not historical argument, these words would have no resonance if she had not been at the Last Supper:


Dumbly, I reached out to touch. 

His presence lay on my tongue

like a new language

I was learning to speak.


There is one final point. Since women’s invitation to the banquet of the Lord has never, ever been questioned, from the earliest days of the Acts of the Apostles to the present, does that not bear witness to them having been present at it always, right from its institution?


Margaret Hebblethwaite is writing a book about the women in the gospels.

17 March 2025
Interview with Soline Humbert Irish Daily Mail 15 March 2025
by Soline Humbert 25 February 2025
A reflection by Soline Humbert for the Women’s Ordination Conference Retreat “Hidden Springs, Holy Radiance” 9 February 2025 [ see recording on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szP5h1kzEsU ] We have been gathering over the past three days in the presence of Brigid of Kildare, and I am sure she has brought gifts to each one, for my experience is that she is attentive to our needs and very generous with her help. At this stage I just want to share some of my own life journey with Brigid. I first encountered her in 1969 when I came from France to Ireland as a child on holidays to learn English. I went to a small Irish town called Tullow. As it happens it was in Tullow that on the first of February 1807 the order of nuns of St Brigid which had been dissolved at the Reformation, had been refounded by a far-sighted bishop. Symbolically an oak sapling had been brought from Kildare Town, from the church of the oak, to Tullow and planted in the grounds of the Brigidine convent where I took English classes. It was by then a majestic oak tree. It still stands to this day. Coincidentally and somewhat ironically, 1969 was also the year that Pope Paul the 6th removed St Brigid, along with 193 other saints, from the Universal Roman Calendar of saints. The reason being that there wasn’t enough evidence for her existence! That despite the fact she was the most mentioned Irish person in the writings of several centuries after her death... What was true was that her flame had been somehow extinguished, and her importance diminished in a deeply clericalised and patriarchal church as Ireland was at the time. She was in the shadow of St Patrick and very much the secondary patron Saint, reflecting the secondary position of women in general. But change was slowly happening. Having discovered in myself a vocation to the priesthood I eventually co- founded a group for women’s ordination and launched a petition to open all ministries to women in February 1993. At the very same time, which I consider providential, the flame of St Brigid was rekindled by the Brigidine sisters in Kildare Town. Women were stirring after a very long wintertime in the church and in society and becoming more fiery. Brigid with her torch was blazing a way for equality. It is then, and only then, that I came across the story of her ordination as a bishop and I remember my astonishment for I had never read anything like that before, or since, for that matter. Of course, while this fact was mentioned in many of the lives of Brigid going back to the first millennium it had been quietly left out of the pious descriptions of her life which were fed to the people. The way the story is recounted makes it clear that her ordination was considered to be very much the doing of the Holy Spirit. Objections about her gender were voiced but powerless to negate what God had done. It reminds me very much of the passage in the Acts of the Apostles when St Peter is amazed to discover that the Holy Spirit has descended on Cornelius, a gentile, and which leads him to conclude that “God has no favourites”. Brigid’s episcopal ordination at the hands of a bishop overcome by the Spirit is also a powerful affirmation that when it comes to ordination God has no favourite gender. Her ordination’s divine origin shows that Brigid was a bishop because God ordained it, and her. A very subversive truth our Church has yet to learn... As we campaigned for women’s ordination we made sure that this episode from Brigid’s life was brought into the open, again and again, despite clerical efforts to dismiss this dangerous historical memory as pure legend and keep it buried. Interestingly when the Anglican Church of Ireland, (Episcopalian) ordained their first woman bishop in 2013 it was to the diocese of Meath and Kildare! A very symbolic act. I have often gone to St Brigid’s Well in Kildare, a little oasis of peace, to spend some time with Brigid and re-source myself by the gently flowing water. After the First Women’s Ordination Worldwide Dublin international Conference in 2001 I went there again on the anniversary of my baptism and I hung my purple stole on a tree overlooking the well. I had worn that stole for many years as a sign of waiting. From now on I would wear stoles of other colours. And a few years ago, I found myself back in Tullow, as a guest speaker at the invitation of the Brigidine sisters for an international celebration. It was very moving to be able to speak of my calling to priesthood in the place where the order of St Brigid had been revived and where I had first come as a child half a century beforehand! That day I sensed very much the presence of Brigid the bishop and I was filled with joy and gratitude. In some ways we can say St Brigid has risen up and is leading the way for women to rise up. Although a woman in what was very much a man’s world and a man’s church, Brigid exudes a remarkable confidence in her being, in her words and in her actions. No doubt that confidence was rooted in a deeply contemplative life nurtured by prayer. “From the moment I first knew God, I have never let him out of my mind, and I never shall”. She embodies the authority which stems from being filled by the Spirit and a leadership at the service of peace, justice, hospitality to the strangers, charity to the poor and marginalised, reconciliation, healing and harmony with creation and care of the earth. The two Scripture readings we have just heard are very fitting for she was renowned for her practical care and generosity to those in need or suffering. Like Christ, she went around doing good. I must not be the only one who saw and heard in Episcopalian bishop Mariann Budde’s recent words the spirit of St Brigid as she used her God- given authority to plead for mercy for the people in vulnerable situations in the face of unbounded cruelty. Brigid is a bold, dynamic presence. She is said to be a woman of the threshold, of liminal places, and she is a sure guide for our times when we also are in transition on the threshold of a new church and a new world too. She calls to us to step boldly forward with our torches burning brightly, bringing the light and warmth of God’s Love to a world gone cold in the grip of darkness and despair. Her life reminds us that with “God nothing is impossible” and to expect miracles. I shall end on a light- hearted note: I went on pilgrimage to St Brigid’s Well and Solas Bhride in Kildare last Tuesday to prepare for this retreat. On the way back from the well and driving through the wide expanse of the Curragh where thousands of sheep graze freely I started seeing a multitude of rainbows. It reminded me of one of the many whimsical stories about Brigid: Caught in a rainstorm, she hangs her mantle on a sunbeam to dry. Dripping from its edges, colourful rainbows form in the water droplets, and her mantle is ‘bright’ with colour. Lady, from winter’s dark, Star of Imbolc, rise! Dance across our threshold: Scattering warm laughter Seeds of hospitality, Tolerance, forgiveness! Return again to the folk: You the Spring we yearn for! (Tom Hamill)
by Colm Holmes 4 November 2024
Papal plámás is no substitute for an end to discrimination against women
by Colm Holmes 15 October 2024
Vatican says NO to EQUALITY?
by Colm Holmes 4 August 2024
Dr Luca Badini Confalonieri with Fr Helmut Schüller
by Colm Holmes 12 July 2024
WAC International response to Instrumentum Laboris
by Colm Holmes 11 July 2024
It is a dull document but perhaps all the cans that have been kicked down the Synodal road will yet create a din that cannot be ignored.
by Colm Holmes 1 July 2024
Christchurch Cathedral June 30th 2024
by Colm Holmes 26 April 2024
One of the leading thinkers in the Irish Church welcomes the Pope’s ‘change of culture’ but warns that it will peter out unless there are reforms to structures and institutions
by Colm Holmes 15 April 2024
Press Release 15 April 2024: Response to the Vatican letter "Dignitas Infinita"
More posts
Share by:
Privacy Policy