Blog Layout

Comment of Dr Mary McAleese on the instrumentum laboris

Colm Holmes • 11 July 2024

It is a dull document but perhaps all the cans that have been kicked down the Synodal road will yet create a din that cannot be ignored. 

Comment of Dr. Mary McAleese on the instrumentum laboris

 

The instrumentum laboris, that is the working preparatory document which will inform the October 2024 meeting of the Synod of Bishops, is worthy, wordy and ultimately disappointing in its grating piousness and its tediously wordy repetition. 


Deep buried in its 20000 words are the barely recognisable remnants of the distilled discernment of those who in good faith participated in the global synodal process over these past two years believing as Pope Francis had promised that there would be freedom of speech, an open agenda and there would be “nothing about us without us”. The participants views have now been synthesized, edited and thinned out of any subject vaguely touching on controversy. Anyone hoping for clarity on the greater inclusion of women and LGBTIQ+ which were priority demands right across the globe, will likely be disappointed. The latter do not even merit a mention but presumably (hopefully) are among those described as feeling “excluded or on the margins of the ecclesial community or who struggle to find full recognition of their dignity and gifts within it. This lack of welcome leaves them feeling rejected, hinders their journey of faith and encounter with the Lord, and deprives the Church of their contribution to mission”. That message seems to have at least been received even if one has to dig to find in it some crumb of comfort for LGBTIQ+ Catholics. 


The issue of the exclusion of women fares a little better for at least they merit a particular mention. However discussion of their greater participation in ecclesial decision making is advanced mainly as a subject for further study and in the broader context of developing greater lay involvement in Church non-ordained ministries and administrative roles. Will a road-map to that promised land emerge in October 2024?


There are three references to “the circularity of the synodal process” and the “circularity of dialogue”. There can be little doubt that these references accidentally get close to the truth. The synodal process has led the Church round in circles to what purpose remains to be seen. Women and LGBTIQ+ are not only no better off at this juncture in the process but have endured emphatic dismissal of their cases from Pope Francis himself with regard to ordination to deaconate and priesthood, and blessing for same sex married Catholic couples. His interventions robbed the Synod of freedom of speech and an open agenda on two live issues which were manifestly of wide concern among the faithful. Will the synodal process over time prove to be the leaven in Church thinking which opens space for updating of the magisterial teachings, practices and processes which deliberately deprive the Church of the talents of many who do not just feel excluded but actually are excluded. The document fails to admit that these “feelings” of exclusion are grounded in a reality for which the magisterium is responsible and which the Pope has full primatial power to redress any day of the week.


The instrumentum laboris is not likely to excite or inspire the many who were baptised into the Catholic Church but who have exercised their inalienable human right to freely leave the Church (a right not recognised in canon law) whether to embrace another faith, give up on faith altogether, whether in righteous anger over clericalism, misogyny, homophobia, physical and sexual abuse of children by clergy, episcopal protection of criminal clergy and neglect of their victims …. the reasons are many, all valid and unlikely to be reversed by the synodal process so far.


It is a dull document but perhaps all the cans that have been kicked down the Synodal road will yet create a din that cannot be ignored. The People of God made this Synodal process their own until their voice was dubbed over in Vatican-speak but in the vague plans the instrumentum laboris discloses for ongoing, regular formal synodal dialogue at every level of the Church there remains the hope that that voice of the faithful will not be snuffed out but will grow stronger, more synodally sure of itself. 


Meanwhile let us hope the circus full of elephants left out of the synodal room are noisy enough to be heard inside despite the heavy duty sound-proofing.

 


by Colm Holmes 4 November 2024
Papal plámás is no substitute for an end to discrimination against women
by Colm Holmes 15 October 2024
Vatican says NO to EQUALITY?
by Colm Holmes 4 August 2024
Dr Luca Badini Confalonieri with Fr Helmut Schüller
by Colm Holmes 12 July 2024
WAC International response to Instrumentum Laboris
by Colm Holmes 1 July 2024
Christchurch Cathedral June 30th 2024
by Margaret Hebblethwaite 9 May 2024
The Tablet used WAC Ireland's "Last Supper" painted by Irish artist Nora Kelly on its cover
by Colm Holmes 26 April 2024
One of the leading thinkers in the Irish Church welcomes the Pope’s ‘change of culture’ but warns that it will peter out unless there are reforms to structures and institutions
by Colm Holmes 15 April 2024
Press Release 15 April 2024: Response to the Vatican letter "Dignitas Infinita"
by Colm Holmes 6 April 2024
Overall control of the Study Groups should be given to the Synodal Office
by Colm Holmes 2 April 2024
Dear Cardinal Mario Grech, We welcome and embrace ‘Synodality’ as a way of ‘being Church’ that is at once both ancient and new in our tradition. We support the three key themes of the Synodal Process: Communion, Participation and Mission . We understand that it is “how” we relate to one another in the Church, our capacity to ‘be together’ in harmony and unity (i.e. Communion), that will help us fulfil our various responsibilities and roles (i.e. Participation) and by doing so empower us as “Church” to bear witness to the love of God in the world and to the unity of all humankind in God (i.e Mission). We are a network of Catholics who treasure our faith tradition and love the Church because, as our name states; we are all the Church. We wish to contribute constructively to its renewal and reform and have good relations with all. It is because we care so deeply about the Church and its mission that we have felt compelled over the years to speak up and question the injustice of structures, practices and teachings that have blocked, rather than channelled, God’s grace in the world. Combined with a lack of accountability and a culture of secrecy, these unjust structures, practices and teachings have contributed (among other egregious wrongs) to the clerical abuse of children and vulnerable adults, and the institutionalised discrimination of half the world’s population, women. Since the Second Vatican Council, it is understood that all the baptised regardless of the different ministries and responsibilities they hold, share a foundational equality by virtue of their common baptism. Contrary to popular perception, the Church (in theory at least) is neither a democracy nor a dictatorship but an ordered community where power and authority are exercised as Christian service and not power over anyone, in accord with the Gospel message. Vatican II has been crucial in reshaping our understanding of “Church” and highlighting the co-responsibility of the laity, along with the hierarchy, in working for its renewal and reform. By highlighting the baptismal dignity and equality of every baptised person, the Council has helped us to more fully appreciate that the Holy Spirit works and speaks through each lay woman and man in the Church, as much as it does through each member of the male hierarchy. The significance of this insight is that the sensus fidelium (i.e the sense of faith in all the faithful) is now regarded to be as vital a part of the teaching authority of the church (i.e the magisterium) as that of the hierarchy. Pope Francis is the first Pope to promote the sensus fidelium in the Church and his global Synodal Process explicitly gives expression to it. It is regrettable however that this shift in the internal dynamics of the Church’s magisterium has not been communicated better or explained clearly to the majority of Catholics. Many remain unaware that the teaching authority of the Church is no longer the exclusive preserve of the hierarchy. They do not know that the bishops and the Pope are obliged to engage in meaningful consultation with all the People of God before making key decisions. Significantly, the change does not diminish the role of discernment assigned to the bishops by the Council, but it does oblige them to anchor their discernment in an authentic and faithful listening to the People of God. And this is where we have a problem. It is one thing to be told “We are all the Church together” and another to experience the reality of such declarations. The most glaring example of this incoherence is the way women are treated. While we acknowledge the inclusion of 54 Women amongst 70 non-bishops voting at the Synod, we must also express deep disappointment and concern at the lack of progress so far. Although the ordination of women priests was mentioned in many countries, it was not included on the agenda for the Global Synod in Rome and most reports on the female diaconate have never been published. This is simply not good enough. It is not in the spirit of synodality to ignore the concerns of women who make up half of the world’s population. We call on the bishops to renew their commitment to the Synodal Process; to authentically listen (i.e. listen from the heart) to their sisters in the Church, to relinquish all attachments to power and privilege and to stop clinging to an out-dated model of church. The Church can not be a credible or effective sign of God’s love and justice in the world as long as its own structures and processes lack transparency and discriminate against half the membership of the baptised faithful (i.e. women, half the population of the world). Instead of criticising society to change and act differently, it is time for the Church (i.e the whole church, the ordained and the laity) to become the change it proclaims about God’s peace and justice in the world and to lead by example in the way it organises itself at every level. We Are Church International calls for the following steps representing concrete signs of synodality to be endorsed by the Synod in October 2024: 1. Shared decision making with equal numbers of laity and clerics at all Synods, Assemblies and Councils. 2. Opening all Ministries to women and to married persons, regardless of their sexual orientation. 3. Appointment of bishops to be overseen by committees of lay and clerics. 4. Unity in Diversity allowing countries to deal with their respective important concerns such as the ones mentioned in 1. - 3. above in accordance with their culture and the legitimate concerns of the believers in these countries. 5. Draw up a Church Constitution setting out the rights and responsibilities of all the people of God and a new governance structure. WICR have prepared a very good draft: https://www.wijngaardsinstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/wicr__background_and_sources_of_proposed_constitution__2022.pdf Colm Holmes, Chair We are Church International Email: colmholmes2020@gmail.com Phone: +353 86606 3636 Dr Martha Heizer, Vice-Chair We are Church International Email: martha@heizer.at Phone: +43 650 4168500 W www.we-are-church.org We Are Church International (WAC) founded in Rome in 1996, is a global coalition of national church reform groups. It is committed to the renewal of the Roman Catholic Church based on the Second Vatican Council (1962-1965) and the theological spirit developed from it.
More posts
Share by: